Assessing research productivity in an oncology research institute: the role of the documentation center.
AUTOR(ES)
Ugolini, D
RESUMO
An evaluation method used to assess the quality of research productivity and to provide priorities for budget allocation purposes is presented. This method, developed by a working group of the National Institute for Research on Cancer (IST), Genoa, Italy, is based on the partitioning of categories of the Science Citation Index and Journal Citation Reports (SCI-JCR) into deciles, which normalizes journal impact factors in order to gauge the quality of the productivity. A second parameter related to the number of staff of each institute department co-authoring a given paper has been introduced in order to guide departmental budget allocations. The information scientists of the IST Documentation Center who participated in the working group played a pivotal role in developing the computerized database of publications, providing and analyzing data, supplying and evaluating literature on the topic, and placing international bibliographic databases at the working group's disposal.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=226220Documentos Relacionados
- The first psychiatric institute: how research and education changed practice
- The development of an enterprise resource planning system (ERP) for a research and technology institute: the case of the Nuclear and energy research institute - IPEN
- Assessing the scientific research productivity of a Brazilian healthcare institution: a case study at the heart institute of São Paulo, Brazil
- A specialized information center. The clinical neurology information center.
- Liaison services for a remotely located biotechnology research center.