Ceramic characterization and factography of resin-ceramic adhesive interface after different ceramic surface treatments / Caracterização ceramica e avaliação fractografica da interface adesiva com resina, apos diferentes tratamentos de superficie
AUTOR(ES)
Noeli Boscato
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2005
RESUMO
This study evaluated the effect of ceramic surface treatments on tensile bond strength (?) and the mode of failure of a resin bonded to two types of ceramics, testing the hypothesis that ? of ceramics to resin is controlled by the ceramic surface treatment. Methods: Ten blocks of each the hot-pressed leucite-based ceramic (E1- IPS Empress) and the two-phase glassy feldspathic ceramic (V7-VITAVM7) were fabricated, polished through 1 µm alumina abrasive, and divided into two groups per ceramic (n=5): Groups E1HF and V7HF, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) was applied for 60 s; Groups E1CS e V7CS, silica coating (CS) using Cojet System (3M-Espe) for 15 s. The treated ceramic surfaces were washed and dried. Silane was applied and let to evaporate. An adhesive resin (Single Bond, 3M) followed by a resin composite (Z250, 3M) were applied on the ceramic treated surfaces and light cured. The composite-ceramic blocks were cut to produce bar-shaped specimens with a mean bonding area of 1.04 mm2 (n=30). Specimens were stored in 37°C distilled water for 1 week before tensile loading to failure in a universal testing machine with cross-head speed of 1.0 mm.min-1. Fracture surfaces were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results were statistically analyzed using one way ANOVA, Tukey?s test and Weibull analyses. Results: Mean ? and standard deviation (MPa) values were as follows: E1HF: 29.8±4.5(a); E1CS: 24.6±5.6(b); V7HF: 22.3±4.0(b); V7CS: 15.7±6.9(c). Mean ? value of Group E1HF was statistically higher than the other Groups mean values (p=0.0001). HF treatment produced significantly higher mean ? value than CS treatment, independent of the ceramic material (p=0.0001). All fractures occurred within the adhesion zone. E1HF showed the highest Weibull modulus (m) value (7.66) and V7CS exhibited the lowest m value (2.54). Conclusion: Results confirmed the testing hypothesis that ? of ceramics to resin is controlled primarily by the ceramic surface treatment
ASSUNTO(S)
ceramica odontologica fractography ceramic dentistry fractografia
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://libdigi.unicamp.br/document/?code=vtls000359666Documentos Relacionados
- Efeito de diferentes tratamentos de superfície na resistência de união adesiva em resina composta contaminada por saliva
- Avaliação da resistência ao cisalhamento da zircônia após diferentes tratamentos de superfície
- Estudo comparativo da resistÃncia de uniÃo entre resina composta e cerÃmica submetida a diferentes tratamentos de superfÃcie
- Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements base on tooth/composite resin adhesive interface after termocycling
- Avaliação da resistencia de união entre uma ceramica de alto conteudo cristalino - zirconia - e dois cimentos resinosos, apos diferentes tratamentos de superficie