Clinical and economic consequences of a reimbursement restriction of nebulised respiratory therapy in adults: direct comparison of randomised and observational evaluations
AUTOR(ES)
Schneeweiss, Sebastian
FONTE
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the results of a randomised and an observational evaluation of the same policy that restricted reimbursement for nebulised respiratory medications in adult patients in a community setting.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=381049Documentos Relacionados
- Economic evaluations exclude important health consequences
- Uninsured working-age adults: characteristics and consequences.
- Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
- Emergence delirium following sevoflurane anesthesia in adults: prospective observational study
- Case‐mix adjustment in non‐randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy