Comparison of a New, Affordable Flow Cytometric Method and the Manual Magnetic Bead Technique for CD4 T-Lymphocyte Counting in a Northern Nigerian Setting
AUTOR(ES)
Imade, Godwin E.
FONTE
American Society for Microbiology
RESUMO
We compared two techniques for CD4 T-lymphocyte counting: flow cytometry (Cyflow) and magnetic beads (Dynabead). Similar results with good correlation were obtained from the 40 adult blood samples counted (P = 0.057, r = 0.93). The Cyflow technique is more precise and cost-effective than the Dynabead method ($3 to $5 versus $12 to $22 per test, respectively), since as many as 200 samples can be measured per day.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=540213Documentos Relacionados
- Multisite Comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-Lymphocyte Counting by Single- versus Multiple-Platform Methodologies: Evaluation of Beckman Coulter Flow-Count Fluorospheres and the tetraONE System
- Predominant CD4 T-lymphocyte tropism of human herpesvirus 6-related virus.
- Affordable CD4+-T-Cell Counting by Flow Cytometry: CD45 Gating for Volumetric Analysis
- New Rat Model of Pneumocystis Pneumonia Induced by Anti-CD4+ T-Lymphocyte Antibodies
- Vaccinia virus-specific human CD4+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte clones.