Comparison of PCR and hybrid capture methods for detection of human papillomavirus in injection drug-using women at high risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
AUTOR(ES)
Shah, K V
RESUMO
We compared Hybrid Capture, a new technique for detection of human papillomaviruses (HPV), with a PCR assay based on L1 consensus primers. By both methods, the HPV prevalence was higher in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women than in HIV-negative women. PCR had a higher sensitivity (0.89 versus 0.48) but lower specificity (0.43 versus 0.93) for detection of Pap smear abnormalities, compared to Hybrid Capture. The higher intensity of hybridization signal by PCR was related to higher estimates of viral load by Hybrid Capture.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=229616Documentos Relacionados
- Hybrid capture II and PapilloCheck® tests for detection of anal high-risk human papillomavirus
- Comparison of PCR- and Hybrid Capture-Based Human Papillomavirus Detection Systems Using Multiple Cervical Specimen Collection Strategies
- Comparison of PCR- and Hybrid Capture-Based Human Papillomavirus Detection Systems Using Multiple Cervical Specimen Collection Strategies
- Hybrid capture II, a new sensitive test for human papillomavirus detection. Comparison with hybrid capture I and PCR results in cervical lesions.
- Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens.