Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria.
AUTOR(ES)
Bowden, W B
RESUMO
Planktonic bacteria from an estuary were concentrated on membrane filters and counted with both a scanning electron microscope and an epi-illuminated fluorescent microscope. Counts on 0.2 micron Nuclepore filters (polycarbonate) were significantly higher (P less than 0.001) than counts on 0.2-micron Sartorius filters (cellulose). In contrast, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques when Nuclepore filters were used (0.5 less than P less than 0.9). The average cell volume from this study area was 0.047 micron3. The estimated number of bacteria ranged from 10(6) to 10(7) bacteria per ml, representing from 4 to 40 mg of C per m3.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=170857Documentos Relacionados
- Comparison of Two Direct-Count Methods for Determining Metabolizing Bacteria in Freshwater †
- Statistical analysis of the direct count method for enumerating bacteria.
- Comparison of Methods for Enumerating Fluorescent Bacteria1
- SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE PLATE-COUNT METHOD OF ENUMERATING BACTERIA IN MILK
- Comparison of Gelman and Millipore Membrane Filters for Enumerating Fecal Coliform Bacteria