Conventional tissue culture compared with rapid immunofluorescence for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from patients attending a genitourinary clinic.
AUTOR(ES)
Teare, E L
RESUMO
Specimens collected from 182 patients with histories suggesting chlamydial disease were examined by conventional culture and direct immunofluorescence techniques. Chlamydia trachomatis was identified by both methods in 57% of all patients. There was no significant difference between the two methods in detecting C trachomatis. Where a tissue culture service is not already established, cost analysis in individual departments may justify the use of the immunofluorescence method.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1011864Documentos Relacionados
- Conventional tissue culture compared with rapid immunofluorescence for identifying chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from patients attending a genitourinary clinic.
- Declining incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis in women attending a provincial genitourinary medicine clinic.
- Prevalence of psychosexual problems in patients attending a genitourinary clinic.
- Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in men attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.
- PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical, urethral, rectal, and pharyngeal swab samples obtained from patients attending an STD clinic.