Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C Systems for Identification of Common and Rare Clinical Yeast Isolates
AUTOR(ES)
Ramani, Rama
FONTE
American Society for Microbiology
RESUMO
The abilities of the API 20C and ID 32C yeast identification systems to identify 123 common and 120 rare clinical yeast isolates were compared. API 20C facilitated correct identification of 97% common and 88% rare isolates while ID 32C facilitated correct identification of 92% common and 85% rare isolates.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=105341Documentos Relacionados
- Comparison of RapID Yeast Plus System with API 20C System for Identification of Common, New, and Emerging Yeast Pathogens
- Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
- Comparative Performance of the RapID Yeast Plus System and the API 20C AUX Clinical Yeast System
- Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.
- Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
