Evaluation of the Lumac kit for the detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence.
AUTOR(ES)
Mackett, D
RESUMO
Four hundred and twenty-two urine samples were screened for significant bacteriuria using bioluminescence and microscopy of uncentrifuged urine. A smaller number of false-negatives were seen with bioluminescence (10%) than with microscopy (40%) while both techniques gave a similar number of false-positives (18%). The kit required a large amount of manual preparation, largely pipetting. With this and the short shelf-life of the reconstituted reagents, it is not suitable for small numbers of urines. At 45p per urine, the cost of bioluminescence is too high.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=497457Documentos Relacionados
- Comparison of the Lumac and Monolight systems for detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence.
- Clinical evaluation of the Lumac bioluminescence method for screening urine specimens.
- Evaluation of a nitrite test kit (Stat-test) for the detection of significant bacteriuria
- Molecular biology of bacterial bioluminescence.
- Bioluminescence screening for bacteriuria.