Evaluation of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs participation in the lumbar lordosis / Avaliação da participação dos corpos vertebrais e discos intervertebrais na composição da lordose lombar

AUTOR(ES)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO

2006

RESUMO

The vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs participation in lumbar lordosis and their contribution between lumbar curves of different size were studied. 350 lumbar spine radiographs of asymptomatic adults (143 men and 207 women, average age 29 years) were evaluated. Lumbosacral (L1S1) and lumbolumbar (L1L5) curves and the angular inclination of each vertebral boby and intervertebral disc were measured using a Cobb method variant. The percentile participation of each vertebral body and intervertebral disc in the lumbossacal curve was calculated. Sex and age were compared. The subjects were separated in tree subgroups, in acording to lumbosacral curve size. The compounds of lumbar curve (discs and vertebrae) were compared in these tree subgroups. The mean lumbosacral curve was ?60,9º (-33º to ?89º). L1 vertebral body was kyphotic (2,15º), L2 was neutral (-0,36º), and the other ones were progressively lordotic from L3 (-1,56º) to L5 (-9,23º). The intervertebral discs were progressively lordotic from L1-L2 (?4,99º) to L5-S1 (?15,58º). Both vertebrae and discs showed a progressive participation in cephalic-caudal direction. The participation of discs was about 80% of lumbosacral curve, and the caudal elements (L4, L5 vertebrae and L4-L5, L5-S1 discs) contributed far 65% of the curve. The older subjects presented lumbar curves larger than younger 4º average, with significant statistical difference to L2, L5 and L3-L4 measures, with older subjects presenting bigger angular values. There were statistical differences of lumbar curves, L2 and L4 measures between sexes, with females presenting bigger values. The lumbosacral curve presented average -46,9º in minor lordosis subgroup, -64,59º in intermediate lordosis sugbroup, and ?74,13º in major lordosis subgroup. The lumbolumbar curve presented average ?33,28º in minor lordosis subgroup, -45,34º in intermediate lordosis subgroup, and ?56,96º in major lordosis subgroup. The absolut values of vertebrae and discs angles were smaller in minor lordosis subgroup than in major lordosis subgroup, but the intervertebral discs participation of was bigger in minor lordosis subgroup (88%) than intermediate lordosis (81%) and major lordosis (75%) subgroups. Complementarely, the vertebrae had a bigger participation in intermediate and major lordosis subgroups. Individually, the vertebrae presented a larger participation in major lordosis subgroup, excepting L5 that presented bigger participation in minor lordosis subgroup. The discs presented larger participation in minor lordosis subgroup. That is consequence of a more kyphotic inclination of the cephalic vertebrae in minor lordosis subgroup than the other ones, causing a compensating effect, with a larger disc participation in the small curves. The intermediate and major lordosis subgroups had the cephalic vertebrae more lordotic than that of the minor lordosis subgroup. We concluded that the intervertebral discs are the main responsible for the lumbar curve angulation and that the contribution of vertebrae and discs in lumbar curves of different sizes is not equal. In spite of a gradual increase of lordotic wedging while lumbar curve increase, the cephalic vertebrae make the disc and vertebrae participation different between different magnitude lumbar curves.

ASSUNTO(S)

disco intervertebral lumbar lordosis spine vertebra vértebra lombar região lombossacra intervertebral disc lordose

ACESSO AO ARTIGO

Documentos Relacionados