Instability of signaling resolution models of parent–offspring conflict
AUTOR(ES)
Rodríguez-Gironés, Miguel A.
FONTE
The National Academy of Sciences
RESUMO
Recent signaling resolution models of parent–offspring conflict have provided an important framework for theoretical and empirical studies of communication and parental care. According to these models, signaling of need is stabilized by its cost. However, our computer simulations of the evolutionary dynamics of chick begging and parental investment show that in Godfray’s model the signaling equilibrium is evolutionarily unstable: populations that start at the signaling equilibrium quickly depart from it. Furthermore, the signaling and nonsignaling equilibria are linked by a continuum of equilibria where chicks above a certain condition do not signal and we show that, contrary to intuition, fitness increases monotonically as the proportion of young that signal decreases. This result forces us to reconsider much of the current literature on signaling of need and highlights the need to investigate the evolutionary stability of signaling equilibria based on the handicap principle.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=22510Documentos Relacionados
- Parent-Offspring and Full Sib Correlations under a Parent-Offspring Mating System
- DNA fingerprinting analysis of parent-offspring conflict in a bee.
- Pooled Genotyping of Microsatellite Markers in Parent–Offspring Trios
- Families on the spot: sexual signals influence parent–offspring interactions
- Familial aggregation of myopia in the Tehran eye study: estimation of the sibling and parent–offspring recurrence risk ratios