Money versus memory
AUTOR(ES)
Araújo, Luis Fernando de Oliveira
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
25/06/2010
RESUMO
A well–established fact in monetary theory is that a key ingredient for the essentiality of money is its role as a form of memory. In this paper we study a notion of memory that includes information about an agent’s past actions and trading opportunities but, in contrast to Kocherlakota (1998), does not include information about the past actions and trading opportunities of an agent’s past partners. We first show that the first–best can be achieved with memory even if it only includes information about an agent’s very recent past. Thus, money can fail to be essential even if memory is minimal. We then establish, more interestingly, that if information about trading opportunities is not part of an agent’s record, then money can be better than memory. This shows that the societal benefit of money lies not only on being a record of past actions, but also on being a record of past trading opportunities, a fact that has been overlooked by the monetary literature.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/6852Documentos Relacionados
- Limited memory and the essentiality of money
- Photographic memory, money, and liposuction: survey of medical students' wish lists
- Brand versus generic medications: the money, the patient and the research
- Emotion-Induced Amnesia in Rats: Working Memory-Specific Impairment, Corticosterone-Memory Correlation, and Fear Versus Arousal Effects on Memory
- Memory for object features versus memory for object location: a positron-emission tomography study of encoding and retrieval processes.