PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SCENARIO-GENERATION METHODS APPLIED TO A STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT MODEL
AUTOR(ES)
Oliveira, Alan Delgado de, Filomena, Tiago Pascoal, Righi, Marcelo Brutti
FONTE
Pesqui. Oper.
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2018-04
RESUMO
ABSTRACT In this paper, we provide an empirical discussion of the differences among some scenario tree-generation approaches for stochastic programming. We consider the classical Monte Carlo sampling and Moment matching methods. Moreover, we test the Resampled average approximation, which is an adaptation of Monte Carlo sampling and Monte Carlo with naive allocation strategy as the benchmark. We test the empirical effects of each approach on the stability of the problem objective function and initial portfolio allocation, using a multistage stochastic chance-constrained asset-liability management (ALM) model as the application. The Moment matching and Resampled average approximation are more stable than the other two strategies.
Documentos Relacionados
- STOCHASTIC GRADIENT METHODS FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION
- Design of a geospatial model applied to Health management
- Comparing stochastic optimization methods to solve the medium-term operation planning problem
- A Stochastic Discount Factor Approach to Asset Pricing Using Panel Data
- Surrogate Modeling Techniques and Heuristic Optimization Methods Applied to Design and Identification Problems