Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial
AUTOR(ES)
Wilkoff, Bruce L
FONTE
BioMed Central
RESUMO
All of the prospective multicenter trials that support the use of implantable defibrillators have used single chamber pacemakers/implantable cardiovertor defibrillators (ICDs). Despite the significantly increased cost of dual chamber pacemaker/ICD devices and the lack of outcome data, these devices accounted for approximately two-thirds of the ICDs implanted in the United States during the 12 months ending April 2001. Dual chamber pacemaker trials have not provided data that would support this trend, but the high incidence of atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and congestive heart failure, as comorbid conditions, suggest that the situation could be different in the defibrillator patient population. The DAVID (Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator) trial is designed to measure the incremental benefit of dual chamber pacemaker/ICDs.
ACESSO AO ARTIGO
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=59522Documentos Relacionados
- Should all adjuvant breast cancer patients receive a bisphosphonate?
- Should All Patients with Risk Factors for Ischemic Heart Disease Receive Aspirin?
- Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
- Dual-Chamber Pacing for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Controversies in Cloning the Conduction System
- Dual chamber pacing for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: has its time come?