Understanding institutions: different paradigms, different conclusions
AUTOR(ES)
Friel, Daniel
FONTE
Rev. Adm. (São Paulo)
DATA DE PUBLICAÇÃO
2017-06
RESUMO
Abstract There is widespread agreement across the social sciences that institutions matter. Although there is widespread agreement that institutions shape the behavior of actors, there are disagreements over the extent to which they actually influence individuals and the degree to which people can shape them. This article argues that these disagreements derive from the fact that scholars are studying different institutions at different levels. Many misunderstandings within the social sciences result from the failure to understand that scholars are often studying different phenomena. This problem would appear to be particularly stark in the discipline of Business Administration because it draws on a variety of areas of study in the social sciences.
Documentos Relacionados
- Tax paradigms, globalization, and the electronic revolution
- Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
- Risk preference instability across institutions: A dilemma
- Internationalization of Higher Education Institutions: perceptions of scholars
- THE DESIGN OF CLIMATE INSTITUTIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS